top of page
Writer's pictureVISS

Estate Planning: Right of First Survivorship versus Trusts


In this article, we will briefly mention the critical points of two approaches to estate planning: issuing company shares to a single natural person with the right of first survivorship versus issuing shares to a trust or similar entity, such as a foundation.


While the intricate nature of estate planning varies depending on the jurisdiction, the key differences in terms of estate planning and the distinct implications of these means can be summarised as follows:


  1. Ownership and Control:

    • Single Natural Person with Right of First Survivorship: If shares are issued to a single natural person with the right of first survivorship, that person becomes the sole owner of the shares. They have complete control over the shares during their lifetime and can decide how to manage, transfer, or sell them.

    • Trust: When shares are issued to a trust, their legal ownership is held by the trust itself, not by the individual beneficiaries. The trustee of the trust manages the shares on behalf of the beneficiaries according to the terms of the trust document. This arrangement may provide more control and flexibility in how the shares are managed and distributed, especially in the case of the original shareholder's incapacity or death.


  2. Probate and Privacy:

    • Single Natural Person with Right of First Survivorship: If an individual holds shares, they will form part of the individual’s estate upon their death. This may lead to the shares going through the probate process, which can be time-consuming and costly. Additionally, the estate details, including the shares, become a matter of public record.

    • Trust: Holding shares in a trust can help avoid probate because the trust, not the individual, owns the shares. This can lead to a smoother and more private transfer of ownership to the trust beneficiaries after the original shareholder’s death.


  3. Asset Protection and Creditor Protection:

    • Single Natural Person with Right of First Survivorship: Shares owned by an individual are generally exposed to the individual’s creditors. In the event of a legal judgment or bankruptcy, the shares may be at risk.

    • Trust: Shares held in a trust may offer better asset protection because no individual owns them. Depending on the type of trust used, the shares may be shielded from the beneficiaries' creditors, providing an added layer of protection.


  4. Tax Implications:

    • Single Natural Person with Right of First Survivorship: The transfer of shares to a single natural person with the right of first survivorship may have immediate tax implications, such as capital gains tax, depending on the value of the shares and the circumstances of the transfer.

    • Trust: Transferring shares to a trust may have different tax implications, depending on the type of trust and the specific tax laws in your jurisdiction. Trusts can sometimes offer tax advantages, such as the ability to distribute income tax-efficiently.


In conclusion, issuing shares to a single natural person with the right of first survivorship and issuing shares to a trust are viable estate planning options, each with advantages and considerations.


We invite you to consult our legal professionals to determine the best approach based on your specific circumstances and goals. For more details, please email us at Contact@viss.com.hk.

Natalia De Obaldía - Lawyer

19 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

コメント


コメント機能がオフになっています。
bottom of page